tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6727975.post8197334089426674382..comments2024-03-25T16:30:58.213+13:00Comments on GREENIE WATCH: JRhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00829082699850674281noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6727975.post-82493157059485137282019-11-08T05:48:41.327+13:002019-11-08T05:48:41.327+13:00IPCC Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change
...IPCC Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change<br /> GCM General Circulation Model (many, based on IPCC CO2 assertions)<br />-------------------------------<br />These six links from five authors are all you really need to understand global warming. <br />My speculation: As the temperature went down into the Little Ice Age, limestone was deposited around the edges of bodies of water. As the temperature has recovered since, the limestone dissolved and added CO2 to the oceans, with a delay of 300-400 years. It was just an accident that this added CO2 coincided with our industrial revolution. Temperature creates CO2, not the other way around. There is proof of that. Read on.<br />----------------------------<br />Pangburn<br />Shows that temperature change over the last 170 years is due to 3 things: 1) cycling of the ocean temperature, 2) sun variations and 3) moisture in the air. There is no significant dependence of temperature on CO2.<br />https://globalclimatedrivers2.blogspot.com/<br />-----------------------------<br />Connolly father & son<br />Shows the vertical temperature profile follows the ideal gas laws and is not caused by CO2. Millions of weather balloon scans and trillions of data points have been analyzed to come to these conclusions. One important conclusion is that there is no green house gas effect. <br />https://globalwarmingsolved.com/2013/11/summary-the-physics-of-the-earths-atmosphere-papers-1-3/<br />utube:<br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfRBr7PEawY<br />------------------------------<br />Pat Frank<br />Shows that GCM results cannot be extrapolated a few years, let alone 50 or 100.<br />https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2019.00223/full<br />and<br />https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/10/15/why-roy-spencers-criticism-is-wrong/<br />---------------------------------<br />Joe Postma<br />Shows that the "flat earth model"of the IPCC is too simple. Their real models are built into the GCMs which don't fit the real data.<br />https://climateofsophistry.com/2019/10/19/the-thing-without-the-thing/<br />philfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03340716730061902839noreply@blogger.com